Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. Jones
This text of 47 S.E. 319 (Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. There was no evidence authorizing a recovery against the Georgia and Alabama Railway, and therefore the court erred in refusing a new trial as to that company.
2. The case being for decision by a court of six Justices, and they being evenly divided in opinion as to whether it was erroneous to refuse a new trial as to the Seaboard Air-Line Railway, the judgment as to that company stands affirmed by operation of law.
3. Direction is given that the costs of this writ of error be equally divided between the Seaboard Air-Line Railway and the defendant in error,
iJudgment affirmed in part; and in part reversed, with direction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
47 S.E. 319, 119 Ga. 906, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seaboard-air-line-railway-v-jones-ga-1904.