Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. Jones

47 S.E. 319, 119 Ga. 906, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 399
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 31, 1904
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 47 S.E. 319 (Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. Jones, 47 S.E. 319, 119 Ga. 906, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 399 (Ga. 1904).

Opinion

By the Cotral.

1. There was no evidence authorizing a recovery against the Georgia and Alabama Railway, and therefore the court erred in refusing a new trial as to that company.

2. The case being for decision by a court of six Justices, and they being evenly divided in opinion as to whether it was erroneous to refuse a new trial as to the Seaboard Air-Line Railway, the judgment as to that company stands affirmed by operation of law.

Argued January 22, Decided March 31, 1904. Action for damages. Before Judge Littlejohn. Dooly superior court. July 2, 1903. J. Randolph Anderson, F. A. Hawkins, and U. V. Whipple, for plaintiffs in error. J. H. Hall, Allen Fort & Son, and F. F. Strozier, contra.

3. Direction is given that the costs of this writ of error be equally divided between the Seaboard Air-Line Railway and the defendant in error,

iJudgment affirmed in part; and in part reversed, with direction.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sikes v. State
154 S.E. 291 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
Thomas v. Thomas
1910 OK 182 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
47 S.E. 319, 119 Ga. 906, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seaboard-air-line-railway-v-jones-ga-1904.