Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. Howe
This text of 77 S.E. 387 (Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. Howe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The evidence tending to show that the lumber of the plaintiff was burned by fire negligently set out by a locomotive of the defendant, and the value of the lumber, was sufficient to authorize the finding of the jury and the charge of the court complained of.
2. The jury found a stipulated amount as principal, and interest in a separate amount. There was no error on the part of the court in [430]*430causing them to retire, with instructions that whatever they found as principal and interest should be united in one lump sum. Western & Atlantic R. Co. v. Brown, 102 Ga. 13 (29 S. E. 130).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
77 S.E. 387, 139 Ga. 429, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seaboard-air-line-railway-v-howe-ga-1913.