Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. Stephens

Supreme Court of Florida

Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. Stephens

114 So. 672, 94 Fla. 965

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided November 25, 1927·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this case the controlling question is whether or not the verdict was supported by the evidence. It appears there is substantial legal evidence to support the verdict and the record discloses no material error.

The judgment should be affirmed on authority of the opinion in the case of Tampa & Jacksonville Railway Company v. Crawford et al., 67 Fla. 77, 64 Sou. 437, and it is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J,, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

In this case the controlling question is whether or not the verdict was supported by the evidence. It appears there is substantial legal evidence to support the verdict and the record discloses no material error.

The judgment should be affirmed on authority of the opinion in the case of Tampa & Jacksonville Railway Company v. Crawford et al., 67 Fla. 77, 64 Sou. 437, and it is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J,, concur.

Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. Stephens, 114 So. 672, 94 Fla. 965 (Fla. 1927).

Pincite

114 So. 672 (Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. Stephens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related