Seaberry v. Smith

534 So. 2d 986, 1988 La. App. LEXIS 2464, 1988 WL 127066
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided November 16, 1988·No. No. 87-CA-897·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE LOUISIANA SUPREME COURT

GOTHARD, Judge.

The Louisiana Supreme Court, 532 So.2d 107, has remanded this case to us for reconsideration of the award to the inter-[987] venor-workers’ compensation insurer in accordance with the majority view in Brooks v. Chicola, 514 So.2d 7 (La.1987) and to treat plaintiffs claim for past medical expenses.

With regard to the past medical expenses, we award $15,745.29 (less 50 percent, i.e., plaintiff’s percentage of comparative fault) to plaintiff, which is the amount the parties stipulated into the record.

With regard to the intervenor’s award, its reimbursement for medical expenses and weekly compensation benefits paid to plaintiff is limited to plaintiff’s damage award for past medicals and lost wages, respectively.

JUDGMENT RENDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Seaberry v. Smith, 534 So. 2d 986, 1988 La. App. LEXIS 2464, 1988 WL 127066 (La. Ct. App. 1988).

534 So. 2d 986 (Seaberry v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Smith
609 So. 2d 809 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1992)
St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Smith
609 So. 2d 809 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1992)
Seaberry v. Smith
536 So. 2d 1257 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1989)