Seaberry v. Smith
Opinion
ON REMAND FROM THE LOUISIANA SUPREME COURT
The Louisiana Supreme Court, 532 So.2d 107, has remanded this case to us for reconsideration of the award to the inter-[987] venor-workers’ compensation insurer in accordance with the majority view in Brooks v. Chicola, 514 So.2d 7 (La.1987) and to treat plaintiffs claim for past medical expenses.
With regard to the past medical expenses, we award $15,745.29 (less 50 percent, i.e., plaintiff’s percentage of comparative fault) to plaintiff, which is the amount the parties stipulated into the record.
With regard to the intervenor’s award, its reimbursement for medical expenses and weekly compensation benefits paid to plaintiff is limited to plaintiff’s damage award for past medicals and lost wages, respectively.
JUDGMENT RENDERED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
534 So. 2d 986 (Seaberry v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.