Sczygelski v. United States Customs & Border Protection

D.C. Circuit

Sczygelski v. United States Customs & Border Protection

599 F. App'x 390

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedMarch 24, 2015

DocketNo. 14-5266

StatusPublished

This text of 599 F. App'x 390 (Sczygelski v. United States Customs & Border Protection) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sczygelski v. United States Customs & Border Protection, 599 F. App'x 390 (D.C. Cir. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the motion for summary affirmance, the opposition thereto, and the reply, it is

ORDERED that the motion be denied. The merits of the parties’ positions are not so clear as to warrant summary action. See Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley, 819 F.2d 294, 297 (D.C.Cir.1987) (per cu-riam).

Because the court has determined that summary disposition is not in order, the Clerk is instructed to calendar this case for presentation to a merits panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI