Scroggins v. State

22 S.W.2d 1072, 113 Tex. Crim. 678, 1929 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 772
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 6, 1929·No. No. 12708.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

The offense is unlawfully passing as true a forged instrument; the punishment confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The caption fails to show the date of the adjournment of the trial court. Under the decisions of this court the state's motion to dismiss the appeal must be sustained. Yarborough v. State, 100 Tex.Crim. R., 273 S.W. 842; Lowery v. State,92 Tex. Crim. 311, 244 S.W. 147; Cousineau v. State,10 S.W.2d 98.

The appeal is dismissed. Appellant is granted fifteen days from this date in which to correct the omission.

Dismissed. *Page 679

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scroggins v. State, 22 S.W.2d 1072, 113 Tex. Crim. 678, 1929 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 772 (Tex. 1929).

22 S.W.2d 1072 (Scroggins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carlisle v. State
194 S.W.2d 90 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1946)