Scott v. Woodhams

246 P. 1029, 79 Colo. 532, 1926 Colo. LEXIS 393
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Scott v. Woodhams. Read the opinion of the Court — 79 Colo. 528
Supreme Court of Colorado·Decided May 24, 1926·No. No. 11,570.·Published

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Allen

delivered the opinion of the court.

Defendants in error W. H. Woodhams and Hattie Woodhams have filed a motion to dismiss the writ. The case is a companion case to No. 11,569, Scott v. Woodhams, et al., 79 Colo. 528, 246 Pac. 1027, differing from it only in the figures and the land involved. The questions raised, and argument made, are the same in each ease. For reasons stated in the opinion filed in cause No. 11,569, the motion is sustained, and the writ dismissed.

Mr. Justice Denison and Mr. Justice Whiteord concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scott v. Woodhams, 246 P. 1029, 79 Colo. 532, 1926 Colo. LEXIS 393 (Colo. 1926).

246 P. 1029 (Scott v. Woodhams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scott v. Woodhams
246 P. 1027 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1926)