Scott v. Woodhams
This text of 246 P. 1029 (Scott v. Woodhams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
Defendants in error W. H. Woodhams and Hattie Woodhams have filed a motion to dismiss the writ. The case is a companion case to No. 11,569, Scott v. Woodhams, et al., 79 Colo. 528, 246 Pac. 1027, differing from it only in the figures and the land involved. The questions raised, and argument made, are the same in each ease. For reasons stated in the opinion filed in cause No. 11,569, the motion is sustained, and the writ dismissed.
Mr. Justice Denison and Mr. Justice Whiteord concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
246 P. 1029, 79 Colo. 532, 1926 Colo. LEXIS 393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-woodhams-colo-1926.