Scott v. United States

543 A.2d 346, 1988 D.C. App. LEXIS 97, 1988 WL 66169
District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided June 20, 1988·No. 85-206, 86-423 and F6849-84·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

*347 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of appellant’s petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc, and the opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED by the merits division ’ that the petition for rehearing is denied; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc, it is

FURTHER ORDERED that appellant’s petition for rehearing en banc is granted and that the opinion and judgment of December 4, 1987, are hereby vacated. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall schedule this matter for argument before the court sitting en banc as soon as the business of the court permits. Counsel are hereby directed to provide ten copies of the briefs heretofore filed to the Clerk on or before June 30, 1988.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scott v. United States, 543 A.2d 346, 1988 D.C. App. LEXIS 97, 1988 WL 66169 (D.C. 1988).

543 A.2d 346 (Scott v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stratmon v. United States
631 A.2d 1177 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1993)
Harper v. United States
608 A.2d 152 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1992)