Scott v. State

43 S.W.2d 96, 1931 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 925
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 4, 1931·No. No. 14926·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

CALHOUN, J.

The offense is the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

There is no statement of facts or bills of exception in the record before us; also no notice of appeal appears in the transcript, and without it this court is without jurisdiction. Article 827, Vernon’s Code of Criminal Procedure 1925, and authorities collated under said article. See, also Hill v. State, 108 Tex. [97]*97Cr. E. 335, 300 S. W. 70; Sandoval v. State, 106 Tex. Cr. R. 468, 293 S. W. 168.

The omission of the notice of appeal requires dismissal of this appeal, and it is accordingly so ordered.

Appeal dismissed.

PEE CTJEIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scott v. State, 43 S.W.2d 96, 1931 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 925 (Tex. 1931).

43 S.W.2d 96 (Scott v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Martin v. State
72 S.W.2d 277 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1934)
Shaddox v. State
45 S.W.2d 980 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1932)