Sandoval v. State
This text of 293 S.W. 168 (Sandoval v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The record before us shows an indictment charging appellant with transporting intoxicating liquor, and the verdict of a jury finding him guilty and assessing his punishment at one year in the penitentiary. If judgment was ever entered on the verdict, or if sentence was ever passed on appellant, the record fails to show it. Final judgment is a prerequisite to appeal. Washington v. State, 91 Tex.Crim. Rep.,
The appeal must be dismissed.
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
293 S.W. 168, 106 Tex. Crim. 468, 1926 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 678, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sandoval-v-state-texcrimapp-1926.