Sandoval v. State

293 S.W. 168, 106 Tex. Crim. 468, 1926 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 678
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 17, 1926
DocketNo. 10423.
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 293 S.W. 168 (Sandoval v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sandoval v. State, 293 S.W. 168, 106 Tex. Crim. 468, 1926 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 678 (Tex. 1926).

Opinions

The record before us shows an indictment charging appellant with transporting intoxicating liquor, and the verdict of a jury finding him guilty and assessing his punishment at one year in the penitentiary. If judgment was ever entered on the verdict, or if sentence was ever passed on appellant, the record fails to show it. Final judgment is a prerequisite to appeal. Washington v. State, 91 Tex.Crim. Rep.,240 S.W. 542. See also notes under Art. 796, Vernon's Ann. C. C. P., Vol. 3 (1925). The record contains a motion for new trial but fails to show that it was ever acted on by the court or that notice of appeal was given. Art. 827, C. C. P. (1925); Griffin v. State, 174 S.W. 351; Parish v. State, 177 S.W. 93; Haynie v. State, 92 Tex.Crim. Rep.; 241 S.W. 478.

The appeal must be dismissed.

Dismissed.

ON APPLICATION FOR CERTIORARI.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fortner v. State
59 S.W.2d 415 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1933)
Williams v. State
54 S.W.2d 114 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1932)
Scott v. State
43 S.W.2d 96 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1931)
Casey v. State
32 S.W.2d 461 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1930)
Bales v. State
18 S.W.2d 1086 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1929)
Phoenix v. State
17 S.W.2d 829 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1929)
Phœnix v. State
17 S.W.2d 829 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1929)
Kirk v. State
13 S.W.2d 106 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)
Johnson v. State
13 S.W.2d 114 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)
Hollifield v. State
10 S.W.2d 101 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)
Coats v. State
1 S.W.2d 288 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1927)
Peoples v. State
296 S.W. 536 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
293 S.W. 168, 106 Tex. Crim. 468, 1926 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 678, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sandoval-v-state-texcrimapp-1926.