Fortner v. State
This text of 59 S.W.2d 415 (Fortner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The offense, possessing intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale; the punishment, one year in the penitentiary.
[487]*487The record fails to show that any notice of appeal was given. Without proper notice of appeal, this court is without jurisdiction. Article 827, C. C. P., 1925; Hollifield v. State, 10 S. W. (2d) 101; Sandoval v. State, 106 Texas Crim. Rep., 468, 293 S. W., 168.
The appeal is dismissed.
Dismissed.
The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
59 S.W.2d 415, 123 Tex. Crim. 486, 1933 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fortner-v-state-texcrimapp-1933.