Home/Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas/Fortner v. State

Fortner v. State

59 S.W.2d 415, 123 Tex. Crim. 486, 1933 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 252
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 8, 1933·No. No. 15630·Published

Opinions

CALHOUN, Judge.

The offense, possessing intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale; the punishment, one year in the penitentiary.

[487] The record fails to show that any notice of appeal was given. Without proper notice of appeal, this court is without jurisdiction. Article 827, C. C. P., 1925; Hollifield v. State, 10 S. W. (2d) 101; Sandoval v. State, 106 Texas Crim. Rep., 468, 293 S. W., 168.

The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fortner v. State, 59 S.W.2d 415, 123 Tex. Crim. 486, 1933 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 252 (Tex. 1933).

59 S.W.2d 415 (Fortner v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte Maple
33 S.W.2d 734 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1930)
Stewart and Stout v. State
18 S.W.2d 629 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1929)
Casey v. State
32 S.W.2d 461 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1930)
Hollifield v. State
10 S.W.2d 101 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)
Sandoval v. State
293 S.W. 168 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1926)
Wheeler v. State
42 S.W.2d 69 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1930)
Bales v. State
18 S.W.2d 1086 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1929)
Bryson v. State
20 S.W.2d 1047 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1929)