Scott v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Scott v. State

887 S.W.2d 632, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1460, 1994 WL 494270

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Scott v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 2066 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 13, 1994·No. No. 65233·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial, without an evi-dentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following his plea of guilty to robbery in the second degree, § 569.030, RSMo 1986. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial, without an evi-dentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following his plea of guilty to robbery in the second degree, § 569.030, RSMo 1986. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Scott v. State, 887 S.W.2d 632, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1460, 1994 WL 494270 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

887 S.W.2d 632 (Scott v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.