Scott v. State

871 S.W.2d 1, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1733, 1993 WL 454419
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Scott v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 767
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 9, 1993·No. No. 63356·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, John W. Scott, appeals from a denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing in the County of St. Louis. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. As we find that an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value, we affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b) and 30.25(b). A memorandum solely for the use of the parties here involved has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scott v. State, 871 S.W.2d 1, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1733, 1993 WL 454419 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

871 S.W.2d 1 (Scott v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.