Scott v. State

66 Ga. App. 659
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 26, 1942
Docket29468
StatusPublished

This text of 66 Ga. App. 659 (Scott v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scott v. State, 66 Ga. App. 659 (Ga. Ct. App. 1942).

Opinion

Gardner, J.

The accused was tried on an indictment for murder, and was convicted of voluntary manslaughter. He excepted to the refusal of a new trial.

1. The evidence would have supported a verdict of a higher offense; it amply sustained the verdict of voluntary manslaughter. The evidence was so simple and clear in support of the verdict that we do not see any benefit to be gained by relating it here.

2. The court did not err in overruling the motion for new trial, based on the' general grounds.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur. F. Joe Turner, Frank A. Bowers, for plaintiff in error. John A. Boykin, solicitor-general, Durwood T. Pye, J. R. Parham, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
66 Ga. App. 659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-state-gactapp-1942.