Scott v. State
122 S.E. 647, 32 Ga. App. 52, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 252
This text of 122 S.E. 647 (Scott v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Scott v. State, 122 S.E. 647, 32 Ga. App. 52, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 252 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).
Opinion
The conviction of the defendant being dependent upon the evidence of an accomplice, and there being no corroborating circumstances which in themselves and independently of the testimony of the accomplice directly connect him with the crime, it was error to overrule his motion for a new trial. See Baker v. State, 14 Ga. App. 578 (4) (81 S. E. 805), and cases cited.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Goff v. State
140 S.E. 793 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
122 S.E. 647, 32 Ga. App. 52, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-state-gactapp-1924.