Scott v. State
122 S.E. 647, 32 Ga. App. 52, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 252
Opinion
The conviction of the defendant being dependent upon the evidence of an accomplice, and there being no corroborating circumstances which in themselves and independently of the testimony of the accomplice directly connect him with the crime, it was error to overrule his motion for a new trial. See Baker v. State, 14 Ga. App. 578 (4) (81 S. E. 805), and cases cited.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Scott v. State, 122 S.E. 647, 32 Ga. App. 52, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 252 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).
122 S.E. 647 (Scott v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Goff v. State
140 S.E. 793 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)