Goff v. State

140 S.E. 793, 37 Ga. App. 471, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 345
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 13, 1927
Docket18463
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 140 S.E. 793 (Goff v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goff v. State, 140 S.E. 793, 37 Ga. App. 471, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 345 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).

Opinion

Brotles, C. J.

Before one can be legally convicted on the testimony of an accomplice, such testimony must be corroborated by other evidence, either direct or circumstantial, which, independently of the testimony of the accomplice, directly connects the accused with the offense charged. Scott v. State, 32 Ga. App. 52 (122 S. E. 647), and cit. In the instant ease the testimony of the accomplice was not so corroborated, and the refusal to grant a new trial was error.

Judgment reversed.

Lulce and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Allen v. State
150 S.E. 863 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
140 S.E. 793, 37 Ga. App. 471, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goff-v-state-gactapp-1927.