Scott v. State
115 So. 925, 22 Ala. App. 689
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Scott v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 22 Ala. App. 380 →
Opinion
Defendant was convicted of violating the prohibition law. We have examined this record, and find no errors prejudicial to defendant. The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Scott v. State, 115 So. 925, 22 Ala. App. 689 (Ala. Ct. App. 1928).
115 So. 925 (Scott v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.