Scott v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Scott v. State

104 So. 925, 20 Ala. App. 695

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 21, 1925

Docket7 Div. 17.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 104 So. 925 (Scott v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scott v. State, 104 So. 925, 20 Ala. App. 695 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

There were many objections and exceptions to the introduction of evidence, none of which present any new or novel questions. None of these are here insisted on as error, further than that they appear in the record, which under the statute we are required to pass upon. We have done this, and find that in the several .rulings there was no error prejudicial to the defendant’s case, which would entitle him .to a reversal. The facts were in dispute, and properly submitted to a jury under a fair charge of the court. We are not authorized to disturb the verdict. There being no error in the record, let the judgment be affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, J.

There were many objections and exceptions to the introduction of evidence, none of which present any new or novel questions. None of these are here insisted on as error, further than that they appear in the record, which under the statute we are required to pass upon. We have done this, and find that in the several .rulings there was no error prejudicial to the defendant’s case, which would entitle him .to a reversal. The facts were in dispute, and properly submitted to a jury under a fair charge of the court. We are not authorized to disturb the verdict. There being no error in the record, let the judgment be affirmed. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

104 So. 925, 20 Ala. App. 695, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-state-alactapp-1925.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack