Scott v. Sowden
16 P. 768, 2 Cal. Unrep. 842, 1888 Cal. LEXIS 968
Opinion
There being no appearance on the part of the appellant, and no points or authorities filed on his behalf, the judgment and order appealed from should be affirmed.
We concur: Belcher, C. C.; Hayne, C.
For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion the judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Scott v. Sowden, 16 P. 768, 2 Cal. Unrep. 842, 1888 Cal. LEXIS 968 (Cal. 1888).
16 P. 768 (Scott v. Sowden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Teilhet v. County of Santa Clara
308 P.2d 356 (California Court of Appeal, 1957)
Bithorn v. Ball
17 P.R. 549 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1911)
Peek v. Peek
17 P. 213 (California Supreme Court, 1888)