Scott v. Richard

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Scott v. Richard

24 So. 2d 180, 1945 La. App. LEXIS 486

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedDecember 21, 1945

DocketNo. 2767.

StatusPublished

This text of 24 So. 2d 180 (Scott v. Richard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scott v. Richard, 24 So. 2d 180, 1945 La. App. LEXIS 486 (La. Ct. App. 1945).

Pincite

Opinion

For the written reasons handed down this day in the consolidated cases of Ethel Scott v. Richard et al. and ElMo Scott v. Richard et al., La. App., 24 So.2d 175, the judgment appealed from is hereby amended so as to decree a judgment against all defendants, namely: Mrs. Ayeline Le-Boeuf Richard, widow of Luke Richard, Sr., Luke Richard, Jr., Ernest Daigle and Nouga Babin, jointly and in solido, and granting an increase of $300 of award rendered, thus making the judgment a solidary one for the sum of $1,759.60, and as thus amended the judgment is affirmed. Defendants to pay all costs.

It is further ordered that that portion of the judgment ordering plaintiff's suit dismissed as against the defendants Mrs. Luke Richard, Sr., and Luke Richard, Jr., be and the same is hereby reversed and set aside.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

For the written reasons handed down this day in the consolidated cases of Ethel Scott v. Richard et al. and ElMo Scott v. Richard et al., La. App., 24 So.2d 175, the judgment appealed from is hereby amended so as to decree a judgment against all defendants, namely: Mrs. Ayeline Le-Boeuf Richard, widow of Luke Richard, Sr., Luke Richard, Jr., Ernest Daigle and Nouga Babin, jointly and in solido, and granting an increase of $300 of award rendered, thus making the judgment a solidary one for the sum of $1,759.60, and as thus amended the judgment is affirmed. Defendants to pay all costs.

It is further ordered that that portion of the judgment ordering plaintiff's suit dismissed as against the defendants Mrs. Luke Richard, Sr., and Luke Richard, Jr., be and the same is hereby reversed and set aside.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 So. 2d 180, 1945 La. App. LEXIS 486, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-richard-lactapp-1945.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack