Scott v. Moore

715 F.2d 161, 114 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2626, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 24145
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 8, 1983
Docket79-1196
StatusPublished

This text of 715 F.2d 161 (Scott v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scott v. Moore, 715 F.2d 161, 114 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2626, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 24145 (5th Cir. 1983).

Opinion

715 F.2d 161

114 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2626

Paul E. SCOTT, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Bill MOORE, et al., Defendants,
Laborers International Union of North America, Local # 870,
et al., Defendants-Appellants,
International Union of Operating Engineers, etc., AFL-CIO,
Local # 450, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 79-1196.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.*

Sept. 8, 1983.

Martin W. Dies, Orange, Tex., for defendants-appellants.

Robert Q. Keith, Arthur R. Almquist, Beaumont, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellees.

Laurence Gold (AFL-CIO), Washington, D.C., amicus curiae.

John H. Smither, Houston, Tex., for Assoc. Bldg. and Cont.

David Crump, Law School, University of Houston, Houston, Tex., David T. Bryant, National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Inc., Springfield, Va., for Legal Foundation of America.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, BROWN, CHARLES CLARK, RONEY, GEE, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, RUBIN, VANCE, KRAVITCH, FRANK M. JOHNSON, Jr., GARZA, HENDERSON, REAVLEY, POLITZ, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, RANDALL, TATE, SAM D. JOHNSON, THOMAS A. CLARK, WILLIAMS and GARWOOD, Circuit Judges.

ORDER:

In accordance with the mandate of the Supreme Court of the United States dated July 5, 1983, --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 3352, 77 L.Ed.2d 1049, and filed in this court August 12, 1983, this cause is remanded to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas with directions to vacate its judgment and dismiss the complaint. All costs are assessed against plaintiffs-appellees.

*

Former Fifth Circuit case, section 9(1) of Public Law 96-452--October 14, 1980

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scott v. Moore
715 F.2d 161 (Fifth Circuit, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
715 F.2d 161, 114 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2626, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 24145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-moore-ca5-1983.