Scott v. Hemmer
This text of 131 Misc. 474 (Scott v. Hemmer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
That the clerk instead of the attorney for the prevailing party prepared the default judgment did not affect the validity of said judgment, and the court had no jurisdiction to open defendant’s default and vacate the judgment after a lapse of more than one year from the date of entry thereof. (Weiss v. Forty-second St., M. & St. N. Ave. R. Co., 123 Misc. 387; Daskal & Fishman v. Corsan Cracker Co., Inc., 219 App. Div. 829.)
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs; motion denied and judgment reinstated.
Bijur and Delehanty, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
131 Misc. 474, 227 N.Y.S. 171, 1928 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 714, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-hemmer-nyappterm-1928.