Daskal v. Corsan Cracker Co.
This text of 219 A.D. 829 (Daskal v. Corsan Cracker Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order of Appellate Term, affirming order of the Municipal Court, unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. There is no inconsistency between the provisions of section 125 of the Municipal Court Code, as amended by Laws of 1923, chapter 769, and section 129, subdivision 2, of the Municipal Court Code, which provides that a motion to open a default and to vacate and set aside a judgment entered thereon must be made with due diligence, and in no event more than one year after the entry of judgment. Present — Kelly, P. J., Manning, Young, Lazansky and Hagarty, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
219 A.D. 829, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daskal-v-corsan-cracker-co-nyappdiv-1927.