Daskal v. Corsan Cracker Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Daskal v. Corsan Cracker Co.

219 A.D. 829

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1927·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order of Appellate Term, affirming order of the Municipal Court, unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. There is no inconsistency between the provisions of section 125 of the Municipal Court Code, as amended by Laws of 1923, chapter 769, and section 129, subdivision 2, of the Municipal Court Code, which provides that a motion to open a default and to vacate and set aside a judgment entered thereon must be made with due diligence, and in no event more than one year after the entry of judgment. Present — Kelly, P. J., Manning, Young, Lazansky and Hagarty, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of Appellate Term, affirming order of the Municipal Court, unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. There is no inconsistency between the provisions of section 125 of the Municipal Court Code, as amended by Laws of 1923, chapter 769, and section 129, subdivision 2, of the Municipal Court Code, which provides that a motion to open a default and to vacate and set aside a judgment entered thereon must be made with due diligence, and in no event more than one year after the entry of judgment. Present — Kelly, P. J., Manning, Young, Lazansky and Hagarty, JJ.

Daskal v. Corsan Cracker Co., 219 A.D. 829 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

219 A.D. 829 (Daskal v. Corsan Cracker Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related