Scott v. Curtis

133 A. 534, 99 N.J. Eq. 890, 14 Stock. 890, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 507
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMay 17, 1926
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 133 A. 534 (Scott v. Curtis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scott v. Curtis, 133 A. 534, 99 N.J. Eq. 890, 14 Stock. 890, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 507 (N.J. 1926).

Opinion

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None. *Page 894

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harrison v. Board of Adjustment
142 A. 353 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1928)
Freund v. Weisman
137 A. 885 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1927)
M. & G. Construction Co. v. Board of Commissioners
134 A. 776 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
133 A. 534, 99 N.J. Eq. 890, 14 Stock. 890, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 507, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-curtis-nj-1926.