Scott v. Curtis
133 A. 534, 99 N.J. Eq. 890, 14 Stock. 890, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 507
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan.
For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None. *Page 894
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Scott v. Curtis, 133 A. 534, 99 N.J. Eq. 890, 14 Stock. 890, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 507 (N.J. 1926).
133 A. 534 (Scott v. Curtis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Certain Lands in Borough of Brooklyn
129 F.2d 577 (Second Circuit, 1942)
Harrison v. Board of Adjustment
142 A. 353 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1928)
Freund v. Weisman
137 A. 885 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1927)
M. & G. Construction Co. v. Board of Commissioners
134 A. 776 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1926)