M. & G. Construction Co. v. Board of Commissioners

134 A. 776, 4 N.J. Misc. 864, 1926 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 92
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 21, 1926·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is a rule to show cause why a mandamus should not issue requiring the issuance to relators of a permit to erect a group of twenty-one individual garages on Yroom street, Jersey City, in a neighborhood largely residential and within one hundred feet of a church.

[865]*865The zoning ordinance of Jersey City prohibits the erection of group garages for more than five vehicles if any part of such buildings, at the entrance of the same, lies within one hundred and fifty feet of a church.

We think that such a regulation is reasonable, and there is nothing in the facts of the present case to lead to a contrary view. Hench v. East Orange, 2 N. J. Mis. R. 510; Portnoff v. Bigelow, 133 Atl. Rep. 534; Long v. Scott, Id. 767; N. J. Land Co. v. East Orange, No. 237 of the present term.

The rule to show cause is therefore discharged, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

M. & G. Construction Co. v. Board of Commissioners, 134 A. 776, 4 N.J. Misc. 864, 1926 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 92 (N.J. 1926).

134 A. 776 (M. & G. Construction Co. v. Board of Commissioners) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scott v. Curtis
133 A. 534 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1926)