Scott v. Berlin

87 A.D.3d 1379, 929 N.Y.2d 899

This text of 87 A.D.3d 1379 (Scott v. Berlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scott v. Berlin, 87 A.D.3d 1379, 929 N.Y.2d 899 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

Memorandum:

The determination sanctioning petitioner for failure to comply with the job search requirements of a work experience program without good cause is supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Gokey v Berlin, 73 AD3d 1472 [2010]; Matter of LaSalle v Wing, 256 AD2d 1243 [1998]; Matter of Bishop v New York State Dept. of Social Servs., 246 AD2d 391 [1998], lv denied 91 NY2d 813 [1998]). Contrary to petitioner’s contention, the sanctions imposed for her failure to comply with those requirements were proper (see Social Services Law § 131 [5]). We have considered petitioner’s remaining contentions and conclude that they are without merit. Present — Scudder, EJ., Smith, Lindley, Sconiers and Gorski, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gokey v. Berlin
73 A.D.3d 1472 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Bishop v. New York State Department of Social Services
246 A.D.2d 391 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
LaSalle v. Wing
256 A.D.2d 1243 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
87 A.D.3d 1379, 929 N.Y.2d 899, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-berlin-nyappdiv-2011.