LaSalle v. Wing

256 A.D.2d 1243, 684 N.Y.S.2d 90, 683 N.Y.S.2d 464, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14445
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 31, 1998·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

—Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: The determination sanctioning petitioner for failure to attend a work experience program interview without good cause is supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Bishop v New York State Dept. of Social Servs., 246 AD2d 391, lv denied 91 NY2d 813; see also, Matter of Kelly v Wing, 237 AD2d 976). The medical reports received at the fair hearing establish that petitioner is able to participate in the work experience program with stated limitations (see, Social Services Law § 332-b [4] [e] [ii]). We have considered petitioner’s remaining contentions and conclude that they are without merit. (CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of Supreme Court, Jefferson County, Gilbert, J.) Present— Green, J. P., Pine, Wisner, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LaSalle v. Wing, 256 A.D.2d 1243, 684 N.Y.S.2d 90, 683 N.Y.S.2d 464, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14445 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

256 A.D.2d 1243 (LaSalle v. Wing) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

SCOTT, TRACY E. v. BERLIN, BETH
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011
Scott v. Berlin
87 A.D.3d 1379 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Gokey v. Berlin
73 A.D.3d 1472 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
McIntosh v. Wing
256 A.D.2d 1246 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)