LaSalle v. Wing

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

LaSalle v. Wing

256 A.D.2d 1243, 684 N.Y.S.2d 90, 683 N.Y.S.2d 464, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14445

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 31, 1998

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 256 A.D.2d 1243 (LaSalle v. Wing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

LaSalle v. Wing, 256 A.D.2d 1243, 684 N.Y.S.2d 90, 683 N.Y.S.2d 464, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14445 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: The determination sanctioning petitioner for failure to attend a work experience program interview without good cause is supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Bishop v New York State Dept. of Social Servs., 246 AD2d 391, lv denied 91 NY2d 813; see also, Matter of Kelly v Wing, 237 AD2d 976). The medical reports received at the fair hearing establish that petitioner is able to participate in the work experience program with stated limitations (see, Social Services Law § 332-b [4] [e] [ii]). We have considered petitioner’s remaining contentions and conclude that they are without merit. (CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of Supreme Court, Jefferson County, Gilbert, J.) Present— Green, J. P., Pine, Wisner, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: The determination sanctioning petitioner for failure to attend a work experience program interview without good cause is supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Bishop v New York State Dept. of Social Servs., 246 AD2d 391, lv denied 91 NY2d 813; see also, Matter of Kelly v Wing, 237 AD2d 976). The medical reports received at the fair hearing establish that petitioner is able to participate in the work experience program with stated limitations (see, Social Services Law § 332-b [4] [e] [ii]). We have considered petitioner’s remaining contentions and conclude that they are without merit. (CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of Supreme Court, Jefferson County, Gilbert, J.) Present— Green, J. P., Pine, Wisner, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 A.D.2d 1243, 684 N.Y.S.2d 90, 683 N.Y.S.2d 464, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lasalle-v-wing-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack