Scott Hura v. Christina Hura

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedAugust 14, 2014
DocketA14D0462
StatusPublished

This text of Scott Hura v. Christina Hura (Scott Hura v. Christina Hura) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scott Hura v. Christina Hura, (Ga. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,__________________ August 07, 2014

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A14D0462. SCOTT HURA v. CHRISTINA HURA.

Scott Hura filed this application from the trial court’s order suspending his visitation with the parties’ minor child. Under OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (11), “[a]ll judgments or orders in child custody cases awarding, refusing to change, or modifying child custody” are directly appealable. Here, the trial court’s order is a custody order as it affects visitation rights, and “[u]nder Georgia law, visitation rights are a part of custody.” Vines v. Vines, 292 Ga. 550, 551 (2) (739 SE2d 374) (2013). A party seeking to challenge a child custody order that affects visitation, therefore, may file a direct appeal. See Edge v. Edge, 290 Ga. 551, 552 (1) (722 SE2d 749) (2012). We will grant an otherwise timely discretionary application if the lower court’s order is subject to direct appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (j). Accordingly, this application is hereby GRANTED. Hura shall have ten days from the date of this order to file a notice of appeal with the trial court. If, however, he has already filed a notice of appeal, he need not file a second notice. The clerk of the trial court is DIRECTED to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 08/07/2014 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,__________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Edge v. Edge
722 S.E.2d 749 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2012)
Vines v. Vines
739 S.E.2d 374 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Scott Hura v. Christina Hura, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-hura-v-christina-hura-gactapp-2014.