Scot L. Zimmerman v. State of Oregon Department of Justice

183 F.3d 1161, 99 Daily Journal DAR 7637, 9 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 954, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5976, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 17731, 1999 WL 543729
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 28, 1999·No. 97-36101·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinions

Order; Dissent by Judge REINHARDT.

ORDER

The panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc.

The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge of the court requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35.

The petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scot L. Zimmerman v. State of Oregon Department of Justice, 183 F.3d 1161, 99 Daily Journal DAR 7637, 9 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 954, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5976, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 17731, 1999 WL 543729 (9th Cir. 1999).

183 F.3d 1161 (Scot L. Zimmerman v. State of Oregon Department of Justice) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lane v. Kitzhaber
841 F. Supp. 2d 1199 (D. Oregon, 2012)
Sánchez-Arroyo v. Department of Education
842 F. Supp. 2d 416 (D. Puerto Rico, 2012)
Skinner v. Salem School District
718 F. Supp. 2d 186 (D. New Hampshire, 2010)
Jackson v. City of Chicago
215 F. Supp. 2d 975 (N.D. Illinois, 2002)
PATRICK W. v. LeMahieu
165 F. Supp. 2d 1144 (D. Hawaii, 2001)