Scopia Windmill LP v. Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP

2022 NY Slip Op 03996
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 21, 2022
DocketIndex No. 650616/16 Appeal No. 16162 Case No. 2022-00876
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2022 NY Slip Op 03996 (Scopia Windmill LP v. Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scopia Windmill LP v. Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP, 2022 NY Slip Op 03996 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Scopia Windmill LP v Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP (2022 NY Slip Op 03996)
Scopia Windmill LP v Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP
2022 NY Slip Op 03996
Decided on June 21, 2022
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: June 21, 2022
Before: Gische, J.P., Friedman, González, Rodriguez, Pitt, JJ.

Index No. 650616/16 Appeal No. 16162 Case No. 2022-00876

[*1]Scopia Windmill LP, et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents,

v

Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP, Defendant-Appellant.


Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP, New York (Peter M. Sartorius of counsel), for appellant.

The Law Offices of Thomas C. Moore, Bronxville (Thomas C. Moore of counsel), for respondents.



Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Andrea Masley, J.), entered February 1, 2022, which denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the legal malpractice claim, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiffs assert a legal malpractice claim alleging that defendant law firm was negligent in failing to perfect a security interest by timely filing a UCC-1 financing statement in connection with a loan they made. Contrary to defendant's contention, the allegations underlying the claim are not "couched in terms of gross speculations on future events" (see Phillips-Smith Specialty Retail Group II v Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl, 265 AD2d 208 [1st Dept 1999], lv denied 94 NY2d 759 [2000]). To the contrary, supported by plausible expert opinion, they depict a hypothetical course of events flowing from the failure to file that caused plaintiffs ascertainable damage that would not have occurred had the lien been timely filed, thereby raising an issue of fact sufficient to defeat summary dismissal of the claim (see e.g. A&L Vil. Mkt., Inc. v 344 Vil., Inc., 170 AD3d 1095 [2d Dept 2019]).THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: June 21, 2022



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scopia Windmill LP v. Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP
2022 NY Slip Op 03996 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2022 NY Slip Op 03996, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scopia-windmill-lp-v-olshan-frome-wolosky-llp-nyappdiv-2022.