Sconzo v. Flower

248 A.D.2d 458, 668 N.Y.S.2d 934, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2294

This text of 248 A.D.2d 458 (Sconzo v. Flower) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sconzo v. Flower, 248 A.D.2d 458, 668 N.Y.S.2d 934, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2294 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, the defendants appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Oshrin, J.), dated January 13, 1997, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

[668 NYS2d 934]

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Material issues of fact exist which require the denial of the

defendants’ motion for summary judgment.

Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, Ritter and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reilly v. Liberty Marine, Inc.
248 A.D.2d 454 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
248 A.D.2d 458, 668 N.Y.S.2d 934, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sconzo-v-flower-nyappdiv-1998.