Reilly v. Liberty Marine, Inc.
This text of 248 A.D.2d 454 (Reilly v. Liberty Marine, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained in a boat showroom, the third-party defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Sangiorgio, J.), dated February 19, 1997, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint and all cross claims asserted against it.
[455]*455Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff sustained an injury while descending a ladder that was “not secured or improperly secured” to the rear of a 25-foot Monterey Cruiser, a boat manufactured by the appellant. An issue of fact exists concerning the nature of the alleged defective condition and whether the third-party defendant may be held liable therefor (see, Robinson v Reed-Prentice Div., 49 NY2d 471, 478; Codling v Paglia, 32 NY2d 330, 342). Accordingly, the third-party defendant, as the party seeking summary judgment, failed to establish entitlement to judgment in its favor as a matter of law, and its motion was properly denied (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
248 A.D.2d 454, 668 N.Y.S.2d 934, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2309, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reilly-v-liberty-marine-inc-nyappdiv-1998.