Scoggins v. State

266 S.W. 513, 98 Tex. Crim. 546, 1924 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 738
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 19, 1924·No. No. 8400.·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

— The offense is driving an automobile while intoxicated; punishment fixed at a fine of one dollar and confinement in the county jail for a period of ninety days.

The attack upon the indictment and the statute upon which the prosecution is founded is not unlike that passed on by this court in Nelson v. State, 261 S. W. Rep. 1046, in which both the law and the indictment were held valid.

The evidence was all one way to the effect that the appellant was drunk and was staggering. Under these circumstances the omission of the definition of the term “intoxicated” is not deemed error requiring a reversal.

Finding no error, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scoggins v. State, 266 S.W. 513, 98 Tex. Crim. 546, 1924 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 738 (Tex. 1924).

266 S.W. 513 (Scoggins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. State
59 S.W.2d 399 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1933)
Nunn v. State
26 S.W.2d 648 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1929)
Stewart v. State
299 S.W. 646 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1927)
Crawford v. State
271 S.W. 1115 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1925)
Williams v. State
271 S.W. 628 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1925)