Crawford v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Crawford v. State

271 S.W. 1115, 100 Tex. Crim. 231, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 413

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided May 20, 1925·No. No. 9091.·Published

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge. —

The offense is the driving of an automobile upon the streets of an incorporated city while under the influence of intoxicating liquor; punishment fixed at confinement in the county jail for a period of ninety days.

The indictment is not dissimilar from that in Scoggins v. State, 266 S. W. Rep. 513.

The facts are not before this court; neither are the complaints of the rulings of the trial court brought forward by bills of exception. We have not perceived or been referred to anything which demands or authorizes a reversal of the judgment. It is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORROW, Presiding Judge. —

The offense is the driving of an automobile upon the streets of an incorporated city while under the influence of intoxicating liquor; punishment fixed at confinement in the county jail for a period of ninety days.

The indictment is not dissimilar from that in Scoggins v. State, 266 S. W. Rep. 513.

The facts are not before this court; neither are the complaints of the rulings of the trial court brought forward by bills of exception. We have not perceived or been referred to anything which demands or authorizes a reversal of the judgment. It is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

Crawford v. State, 271 S.W. 1115, 100 Tex. Crim. 231, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 413 (Tex. 1925).

Pincite

271 S.W. 1115 (Crawford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related