Sclease v. Construction Industry Licensing Board

881 So. 2d 98, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 12476, 2004 WL 1877582
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 24, 2004·No. No. 1D04-1636·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Finding that a “Final Order” filed on October 9, 2003 “was not properly served,” the Construction Industry Licensing Board filed a “NOTICE OF REFILING OF FINAL ORDER,” on March 12, 2004. The NOTICE OF REFILING OF FINAL ORDER does not purport to be an order itself. While an agency has authority to vacate and reenter otherwise final orders in order to avoid due process problems, see Millinger v. Broward County Mental Health Div. And Risk Management, 672 So.2d 24 (Fla.1996); Johnson v. Terry Hunt Construction Co., 878 So.2d 1282 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Durando v. Palm Beach County, 719 So.2d 1258 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), the NOTICE OF REFILING OF FINAL ORDER does not purport to be such a superseding order.

DISMISSED.

BENTON, BROWNING and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sclease v. Construction Industry Licensing Board, 881 So. 2d 98, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 12476, 2004 WL 1877582 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

881 So. 2d 98 (Sclease v. Construction Industry Licensing Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anthony German v. State of Florida Department of Revenue and Alicia Marie Saunders
177 So. 3d 318 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
Filarski v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission
97 So. 3d 278 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)