Anthony German v. State of Florida Department of Revenue and Alicia Marie Saunders

177 So. 3d 318, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 15630, 2015 WL 6161321
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 21, 2015
Docket4D14-4080
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 177 So. 3d 318 (Anthony German v. State of Florida Department of Revenue and Alicia Marie Saunders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anthony German v. State of Florida Department of Revenue and Alicia Marie Saunders, 177 So. 3d 318, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 15630, 2015 WL 6161321 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The father, Anthony German, appeals a Final Administrative Support Order rendered by the Department of Revenue. Because appellant failed to timely , opt out of the administrative process, the Department of Revenue correctly rendered the Final Administrative Support Order and Income Deduction Order. Section 409.2563(2)(f), Florida Statutes (2013), requires that a written request to opt out of the administrative process be filed within 20 days of receipt of the initial notice of proceedings to establish an administrative support order. Appellant filed his request 71 days after receipt of the notice.

As to appellant’s claim that he was denied due process of law because he was unable to connect telephonically into the administrative hearing and appear at the hearing, we affirm because appellant asserts this position for the first time on appeal, and there is nothing in the record to support this assertion. However, we affirm on this issue without prejudice to his right to file a motion to vacate and seek an evidentiary hearing on this matter. See W.T. Holding, Inc. v. State Agency for Health Care Admin., 682 So.2d 1224, 1225 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (holding that, in circumstances involving a due process violation, the administrative agency has the authority to reissue a final order despite the lack of a specific grant of such authority in chapter 120); Solease v. Constr. Indus. Licensing Bd., 881 So.2d 98, 98 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (recognizing that “an agency has authority to vacate and reenter otherwise final orders in order to avoid due process problems”).

As to appellant’s final argument, we affirm without further comment.

Affirmed.

STEVENSON, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Department of Revenue and Mark Cole etc. v. Laura Beth Graczyk
206 So. 3d 157 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Walker v. Department of Revenue
198 So. 3d 735 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
177 So. 3d 318, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 15630, 2015 WL 6161321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anthony-german-v-state-of-florida-department-of-revenue-and-alicia-marie-fladistctapp-2015.