Scissors v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad
311 So. 2d 708, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15071
Opinion
The plaintiff appeals a final judgment pursuant to a j'ury verdict in a negligence case. The only substantial point argued is that the court erred in charging the jury as to a county ordinance. We find no error because a party is entitled to an instruction in accordance with the law if there is evidence in the record which the jury could have believed in forming a basis for the matters instructed upon. See Smith v. Johnson, Fla.App. 1966, 187 So.2d 655.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Scissors v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad, 311 So. 2d 708, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15071 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).
311 So. 2d 708 (Scissors v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gibbons v. Shockley
338 So. 2d 1136 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
Levine v. Frank
311 So. 2d 708 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)