Gibbons v. Shockley

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gibbons v. Shockley

338 So. 2d 1136, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15898

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 2, 1976·No. No. 75-1879·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal by the plaintiff is from a final judgment based on a jury verdict for one of several defendants in a personal injury action. The point argued is that the trial court erred in denying the plaintiffs motion for a new trial because of an allegedly erroneous jury instruction and the failure to give one of plaintiff’s requested [1137] instructions. A review of the record in the light of these arguments convinces us that no error appears. See Smith v. Johnson, 187 So.2d 655 (Fla.2d DCA 1966), and Scissors v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad, 311 So.2d 708 (Fla.3d DCA 1975).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal by the plaintiff is from a final judgment based on a jury verdict for one of several defendants in a personal injury action. The point argued is that the trial court erred in denying the plaintiffs motion for a new trial because of an allegedly erroneous jury instruction and the failure to give one of plaintiff’s requested [1137] instructions. A review of the record in the light of these arguments convinces us that no error appears. See Smith v. Johnson, 187 So.2d 655 (Fla.2d DCA 1966), and Scissors v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad, 311 So.2d 708 (Fla.3d DCA 1975).

Affirmed.

Gibbons v. Shockley, 338 So. 2d 1136, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15898 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

338 So. 2d 1136 (Gibbons v. Shockley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related