Gibbons v. Shockley

338 So. 2d 1136, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15898
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 2, 1976
DocketNo. 75-1879
StatusPublished

This text of 338 So. 2d 1136 (Gibbons v. Shockley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gibbons v. Shockley, 338 So. 2d 1136, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15898 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal by the plaintiff is from a final judgment based on a jury verdict for one of several defendants in a personal injury action. The point argued is that the trial court erred in denying the plaintiffs motion for a new trial because of an allegedly erroneous jury instruction and the failure to give one of plaintiff’s requested [1137]*1137instructions. A review of the record in the light of these arguments convinces us that no error appears. See Smith v. Johnson, 187 So.2d 655 (Fla.2d DCA 1966), and Scissors v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad, 311 So.2d 708 (Fla.3d DCA 1975).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Johnson
187 So. 2d 655 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
Scissors v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad
311 So. 2d 708 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
338 So. 2d 1136, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15898, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gibbons-v-shockley-fladistctapp-1976.