Scidmore v. Smith
13 Johns. 322
This text of 13 Johns. 322 (Scidmore v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Scidmore v. Smith, 13 Johns. 322 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1816).
Opinion
The statute penalty for harbouring slaves or ‘servants, is'cumulative, and. does-not destroy the common law remedy.
Judgment affirmed.
Almy v. Harris, 5 Johns. Rep. 175, Farmer's Turnpike Company v. Coventry, 10 Johns. Rep. 389.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Gonzales v. Kentucky Derby Co.
197 A.D. 277 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1921)
Irving v. Britton
28 N.Y.S. 529 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1894)
Haight v. Badgeley
15 Barb. 499 (New York Supreme Court, 1853)
Doe ex dem. Carr v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.
1 Ga. 524 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1846)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
13 Johns. 322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scidmore-v-smith-nysupct-1816.