Schwing v. City of Baton Rouge

252 So. 2d 667, 259 La. 770
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided October 1, 1971·No. 51633·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

252 So.2d 667 (1971)
259 La. 770

Charles E. SCHWING et al.
v.
The CITY OF BATON ROUGE et al.

No. 51633.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 1, 1971.

Application denied; on the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in their judgment.

SANDERS, J., is of the opinion that a writ should be granted as to Assignment of Error No. 3.

TATE, J., feels that a writ should be granted due to the public importance of the question, even though (as the majority noted) under "the facts found by the Court of Appeal" (namely that the Master Plan putting property owners on notice was not filed until after the subdivision plan and building permit were denied) the result in this case may be correct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schwing v. City of Baton Rouge, 252 So. 2d 667, 259 La. 770 (La. 1971).

252 So. 2d 667 (Schwing v. City of Baton Rouge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Old Jefferson Civic Ass'n Inc. v. Planning Com'n
364 So. 2d 193 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1978)