Schwing v. City of Baton Rouge

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Schwing v. City of Baton Rouge

252 So. 2d 667, 259 La. 770

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedOctober 1, 1971

Docket51633

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 252 So. 2d 667 (Schwing v. City of Baton Rouge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schwing v. City of Baton Rouge, 252 So. 2d 667, 259 La. 770 (La. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

252 So.2d 667 (1971) 259 La. 770

Charles E. SCHWING et al.
v.
The CITY OF BATON ROUGE et al.

No. 51633.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 1, 1971.

Application denied; on the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in their judgment.

SANDERS, J., is of the opinion that a writ should be granted as to Assignment of Error No. 3.

TATE, J., feels that a writ should be granted due to the public importance of the question, even though (as the majority noted) under "the facts found by the Court of Appeal" (namely that the Master Plan putting property owners on notice was not filed until after the subdivision plan and building permit were denied) the result in this case may be correct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

252 So.2d 667 (1971) 259 La. 770

Charles E. SCHWING et al.
v.
The CITY OF BATON ROUGE et al.

No. 51633.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 1, 1971.

Application denied; on the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in their judgment.

SANDERS, J., is of the opinion that a writ should be granted as to Assignment of Error No. 3.

TATE, J., feels that a writ should be granted due to the public importance of the question, even though (as the majority noted) under "the facts found by the Court of Appeal" (namely that the Master Plan putting property owners on notice was not filed until after the subdivision plan and building permit were denied) the result in this case may be correct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

252 So. 2d 667, 259 La. 770, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schwing-v-city-of-baton-rouge-la-1971.

Opinion

Charles E. SCHWING et al. v. The CITY OF BATON ROUGE et al.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Charles E. SCHWING et al.
v.
The CITY OF BATON ROUGE et al.