Schweigert v. Ernst

District of Columbia

Schweigert v. Ernst

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia

DecidedApril 11, 2012

DocketCivil Action No. 2012-0560

StatusPublished

This text of Schweigert v. Ernst (Schweigert v. Ernst) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schweigert v. Ernst, (D.D.C. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT APR 1 1 2012 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Clerk, U.S. District &Bankruptcy Courts for the District of Columbia ) Margaret E. Schweigert, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Civil Action No. 12 0560 Ruth Ernst, ) ) Defendant. ) )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs pro se complaint and application to proceed

in forma pauperis. The Court will grant plaintiffs application and dismiss the complaint for lack

of subject matter jurisdiction.

The subject matter jurisdiction of the federal district courts is limited and is set forth

generally at 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1332. Under those statutes, federal jurisdiction is available

only when a "federal question" is presented or the parties are of diverse citizenship and the

amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. A party seeking relief in the district court must at least

plead facts that bring the suit within the court's jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). Failure to

plead such facts warrants dismissal ofthe action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3).

Plaintiff, a resident of New York, New York, sues an individual identified as the

Date: March 2:}__, 2012 -J1-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI