Schwarz v. Armand Erpf Estate
This text of 232 A.D.2d 316 (Schwarz v. Armand Erpf Estate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), [317]*317entered on or about May 8,1996, which denied defendants’ motion for a change of venue pursuant to CPLR 510 (3) from New York County to Delaware County, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
The motion was properly denied as untimely. Defendants possessed the information necessary to make the motion from the commencement of the action but did not do so for some 16 months, and fail to offer a reasonable excuse for the delay (CPLR 511 [a]). Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Ross, Nardelli and Mazzarelli, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
232 A.D.2d 316, 648 N.Y.S.2d 445, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10559, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schwarz-v-armand-erpf-estate-nyappdiv-1996.