Chiriboga v. Popoli Construction

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Chiriboga v. Popoli Construction

283 A.D.2d 327, 724 N.Y.S.2d 849, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5404

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 24, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 283 A.D.2d 327 (Chiriboga v. Popoli Construction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chiriboga v. Popoli Construction, 283 A.D.2d 327, 724 N.Y.S.2d 849, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5404 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Lowe, III, J.), entered May 26, 2000, which denied the motion of defendant Town and Village of Scarsdale (Scarsdale) for a change of venue from New York County to Westchester County, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Scarsdale’s motion for a change of venue was properly denied. Scarsdale’s 16-month delay in making its motion was inordinate since it possessed the information necessary to the motion from the time of the action’s commencement and of[328]*328fered no reasonable excuse for the delay (see, CPLR 511 [a]; Schwarz v Armand Erpf Estate, 232 AD2d 316). Concur— Nardelli, J. P., Mazzarelli, Wallach, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Lowe, III, J.), entered May 26, 2000, which denied the motion of defendant Town and Village of Scarsdale (Scarsdale) for a change of venue from New York County to Westchester County, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Scarsdale’s motion for a change of venue was properly denied. Scarsdale’s 16-month delay in making its motion was inordinate since it possessed the information necessary to the motion from the time of the action’s commencement and of[328]*328fered no reasonable excuse for the delay (see, CPLR 511 [a]; Schwarz v Armand Erpf Estate, 232 AD2d 316). Concur— Nardelli, J. P., Mazzarelli, Wallach, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

283 A.D.2d 327, 724 N.Y.S.2d 849, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5404, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chiriboga-v-popoli-construction-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack