Schwartzer v. Allstate Insurance Co.

217 So. 2d 843
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 14, 1969·No. No. 68-679·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal presents the same issue which has previously been dealt with in Ringenberger v. General Accident F. & L. Assur. Corp., Fla.App.1968, 214 So.2d 376; Sellers v. Government Employees Insurance Co., Fla.App.1968, 214 So.2d 879; and Morrison Assurance Company, Inc. v. Polak, Fla.App.1968, 216 So.2d 484 (opinion filed in this court December 17, 1968).

In the last cited decision we followed the reasoning set forth in the Sellers decision and noted possible conflict with the Ringenberger decision. Appellee has unsuccessfully attempted to distinguish the present case from the Sellers case. We therefore reverse the declaratory judgment on the authority of the Sellers and Morrison decisions.

Reversed and remanded with directions to enter judgment for the appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schwartzer v. Allstate Insurance Co., 217 So. 2d 843 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).

217 So. 2d 843 (Schwartzer v. Allstate Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sellers v. Government Employees Insurance Co.
214 So. 2d 879 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
Ringenberger v. General Accident Fire and Life Assurance Corporation
214 So. 2d 376 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
Morrison Assurance Co. v. Polak
216 So. 2d 484 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)