Schwartz v. Miltz
This text of 60 A.D.3d 928 (Schwartz v. Miltz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action for the partition and sale of real property, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brandveen, J.), entered May 13, 2008, which, after a nonjury trial, is in favor of the defendant and against him, dismissing the complaint.
[929]*929Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, the complaint is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings consistent herewith.
In August 2004 the plaintiff commenced the instant action for the partition and sale of real property. On a prior appeal in this action, this Court, inter alia, affirmed the Supreme Court’s denial of the defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint (see Schwartz v Miltz, 37 AD3d 816 [2007]).
Following a nonjury trial, the Supreme Court erred in determining that it could not consider whether an award of equitable relief to the plaintiff was appropriate (see CPLR 3017). Accordingly, the matter must be remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, to consider the issue of equitable relief.
The plaintiff’s remaining contentions are without merit. Spolzino, J.P., Ritter, Florio and Miller, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 A.D.3d 928, 874 N.Y.S.2d 815, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schwartz-v-miltz-nyappdiv-2009.