Schwartz v. Miltz

37 A.D.3d 816, 829 N.Y.S.2d 921
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 27, 2007·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action for the partition and sale of real property, the defendant appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brandveen, J.), dated October 6, 2005, as denied that branch of her cross motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

That branch of the defendant’s motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint was properly denied since the defendant did not make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853 [1985]).

In light of our determination, we need not reach the parties’ remaining contentions. Mastro, J.P, Fisher, Angiolillo and McCarthy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schwartz v. Miltz, 37 A.D.3d 816, 829 N.Y.S.2d 921 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

37 A.D.3d 816 (Schwartz v. Miltz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schwartz v. Miltz
60 A.D.3d 928 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)