Schwartz v. Macrose Lumber & Trim Co.
24 N.Y.2d 856
This text of 24 N.Y.2d 856 (Schwartz v. Macrose Lumber & Trim Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Schwartz v. Macrose Lumber & Trim Co., 24 N.Y.2d 856 (N.Y. 1960).
Opinion
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan and Jasen. ' Judges Keating and Breitel dissent and vote to reverse for the reasons stated in the opinion at Trial Term, but to grant a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Schwartz v. MACROSE LUMBER & TRIM CO., INC.
248 N.E.2d 920 (New York Court of Appeals, 1969)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
24 N.Y.2d 856, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schwartz-v-macrose-lumber-trim-co-ny-1960.