Schwartz v. Macrose Lumber & Trim Co.

24 N.Y.2d 856
New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 10, 1960·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan and Jasen. ' Judges Keating and Breitel dissent and vote to reverse for the reasons stated in the opinion at Trial Term, but to grant a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schwartz v. Macrose Lumber & Trim Co., 24 N.Y.2d 856 (N.Y. 1960).

24 N.Y.2d 856 (Schwartz v. Macrose Lumber & Trim Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schwartz v. MACROSE LUMBER & TRIM CO., INC.
248 N.E.2d 920 (New York Court of Appeals, 1969)