Home/New York Court of Appeals/Schwartz v. MACROSE LUMBER & TRIM CO., INC.

Schwartz v. MACROSE LUMBER & TRIM CO., INC.

248 N.E.2d 920, 24 N.Y.2d 856, 301 N.Y.S.2d 91, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 1411
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 10, 1969
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 248 N.E.2d 920 (Schwartz v. MACROSE LUMBER & TRIM CO., INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schwartz v. MACROSE LUMBER & TRIM CO., INC., 248 N.E.2d 920, 24 N.Y.2d 856, 301 N.Y.S.2d 91, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 1411 (N.Y. 1969).

Opinion

24 N.Y.2d 856 (1969)

Paul Schwartz, Appellant,
v.
Macrose Lumber & Trim Co., Inc., et al., Respondents-Appellants.
Wilmod Company, Inc., Defendant-Respondent and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Nissho American Corp., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued January 8, 1969.
Decided April 10, 1969.

Samuel G. Rabinor, Sidney H. Bishop and Albert S. Dranoff for plaintiff-appellant.

Walter Feller and E. Edan Spencer for respondents-appellants.

Michael I. Begun, Murray H. Paloger and Henry B. Raff for third-party defendant-respondent-appellant.

Roger G. McTiernan and Michael R. Treanor for defendant-respondent and third-party plaintiff-appellant.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN and JASEN. Judges KEATING and BREITEL dissent and vote to reverse for the reasons stated in the opinion at Trial Term, but to grant a new trial.

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Joint Eastern & Southern Districts Asbestos Litigation
798 F. Supp. 925 (S.D. New York, 1992)
Wyandotte Industries v. E.Y. Neill & Co. (In Re First Hartford Corp.)
63 B.R. 479 (S.D. New York, 1986)
Computerized Radiological Services, Inc. v. Syntex Corp.
595 F. Supp. 1495 (E.D. New York, 1984)
Roshan L. Mehra, as Administrator of the Goods, Chattels and Credits Which Were of Rajinder K. Mehra v. Roberta Bentz and Rudolph J. Bentz
529 F.2d 1137 (Second Circuit, 1976)
Chisholm v. JR SIMPLOT COMPANY
495 P.2d 1113 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1972)
Antilles Shipping Co. v. Texaco, Inc.
321 F. Supp. 166 (S.D. New York, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
248 N.E.2d 920, 24 N.Y.2d 856, 301 N.Y.S.2d 91, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 1411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schwartz-v-macrose-lumber-trim-co-inc-ny-1969.