Schwartz v. MACROSE LUMBER & TRIM CO., INC.

New York Court of Appeals

Schwartz v. MACROSE LUMBER & TRIM CO., INC.

248 N.E.2d 920, 24 N.Y.2d 856, 301 N.Y.S.2d 91, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 1411

New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 10, 1969·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

24 N.Y.2d 856 (1969)

Paul Schwartz, Appellant,
v.
Macrose Lumber & Trim Co., Inc., et al., Respondents-Appellants.
Wilmod Company, Inc., Defendant-Respondent and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Nissho American Corp., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued January 8, 1969. Decided April 10, 1969.

Samuel G. Rabinor, Sidney H. Bishop and Albert S. Dranoff for plaintiff-appellant.

Walter Feller and E. Edan Spencer for respondents-appellants.

Michael I. Begun, Murray H. Paloger and Henry B. Raff for third-party defendant-respondent-appellant.

Roger G. McTiernan and Michael R. Treanor for defendant-respondent and third-party plaintiff-appellant.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN and JASEN. Judges KEATING and BREITEL dissent and vote to reverse for the reasons stated in the opinion at Trial Term, but to grant a new trial.

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

24 N.Y.2d 856 (1969)

Paul Schwartz, Appellant,
v.
Macrose Lumber & Trim Co., Inc., et al., Respondents-Appellants.
Wilmod Company, Inc., Defendant-Respondent and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Nissho American Corp., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued January 8, 1969. Decided April 10, 1969.

Samuel G. Rabinor, Sidney H. Bishop and Albert S. Dranoff for plaintiff-appellant.

Walter Feller and E. Edan Spencer for respondents-appellants.

Michael I. Begun, Murray H. Paloger and Henry B. Raff for third-party defendant-respondent-appellant.

Roger G. McTiernan and Michael R. Treanor for defendant-respondent and third-party plaintiff-appellant.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN and JASEN. Judges KEATING and BREITEL dissent and vote to reverse for the reasons stated in the opinion at Trial Term, but to grant a new trial.

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Schwartz v. MACROSE LUMBER & TRIM CO., INC., 248 N.E.2d 920, 24 N.Y.2d 856, 301 N.Y.S.2d 91, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 1411 (N.Y. 1969).

Pincite

248 N.E.2d 920 (Schwartz v. MACROSE LUMBER & TRIM CO., INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Paul Schwartz, Appellant, v. Macrose Lumber & Trim Co., Inc., et al., Respondents-Appellants. Wilmod Company, Inc., Defendant-Respondent and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Nissho American Corp., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent-Appellant.

Related

Paul Schwartz, Appellant,
v.
Macrose Lumber & Trim Co., Inc., et al., Respondents-Appellants.
Wilmod Company, Inc., Defendant-Respondent and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Nissho American Corp., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent-Appellant.