Schwartz v. Homefix Custom Remodeling Corp

District Court, S.D. Ohio·Decided March 18, 2024·No. 1:23-cv-00375·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

MICHAEL SCHWARTZ, : : Plaintiff, : : Case No. 1:23-cv-375 v. :

: Judge Jeffery P. Hopkins HOMEFIX CUSTOM REMODELING : CORP. : : Defendant. :

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on Report and Recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on September 12, 2023 (Doc. 17), which recommends that Plaintiff’s Application for Entry of Default Against Defendant (Doc. 8) be DENIED. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation as well as the entire record before it. Because no objections have been filed and the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, the Court reviews the Report and Recommendation for clear error. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) advisory committee notes (“When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.”); Redmon v. Noel, No. 1:21-CV-445, 2021 WL 4771259, at *1 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 13, 2021) (collecting cases). The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and determined that it does not contain clear error. Therefore, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that 1. Plaintiff's Application for Entry of Default against Defendant (Doc. 8) be DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 18, 2024 Aaraig | Lahiri fi on. JetheryZ?. Hopkin United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schwartz v. Homefix Custom Remodeling Corp, (S.D. Ohio 2024).

Schwartz v. Homefix Custom Remodeling Corp (Schwartz v. Homefix Custom Remodeling Corp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.